CPU Reviews

Intel Core i7-5775C Review: More Than Meets the Eye

« Test System and Testing Procedures | Clock-for-Clock Comparison vs Haswell @ 4GHz »

CPU Benchmarks

The AIDA64 suite has various benchmarks for CPU, FPU and memory testing: CPU Queen is an integer benchmark that tests branch prediction and misprediction penalties. CPU PhotoWorxx tests the SIMD integer arithmetic execution units of the CPU and the memory subsystem. CPU ZLib is a compression benchmark that tests the combined CPU and memory performance. CPU AES is a multi-core encryption benchmark that uses Advanced Encryption Standard data encryption. CPU Hash is an integer benchmark that measures performance using SHA1 hashing algorithm.


FPUJulia measures single precision FP, FPU Mandel measures double precision FP, FPUSinJulia measures extended precision FP while FPUVP8 is a video compression test utilizing the FPUJulia fractal module. Despite the lower clock speed at stock, the i7-5775C pulls ahead in CPU hash and Photoworx and matches the CPU Z-lib performance of a stock i7-4770K. These results are to be taken with some reservations as AIDA64’s i7-5775C “Broadwell” support is still in beta so these results will be updated at a later time when a newer version of the software comes out.


MAXON’s Cinebench R15 runs two sets of benchmarks, a processor test for the CPU and an OpenGL test for the graphics cards. The 3D rendering workload is based on Maxon’s Cinema 4D, a program utilized by movie production studios world wide for special effects so it is a semi-synthetic test closer to real-world 3D graphics benchmarking. Not surprisingly, with the i7-5775C’s stronger Iris Pro graphics, it pulls ahead of the i7-4770K in OpenGL. This level of performance also leap frogs ahead of the A10-7850K’s R7 graphics by close to 10 points. Single core performance is close but multi-core leaves a considerable gap between the i7-4770K and the i7-5775C at stock.



Cache and Memory Benchmarks

Aside from CPU and FPU benchmarks, AIDA64 also has a cache and memory benchmark built-in. Due to differences in architecture of course, the AMD APU only has an L1 and L2 cache while the i7-5775C is the only one with an “L4” cache which refers to its pool of eDRAM that is not available in the previous generation Haswell i7-4770K processor.



Multimedia, Compression and Semi-Synthetic Benchmarks

x264 is a popular free software library for encoding video streams into the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC format. x264 FHD measures how efficient a system is in encoding H.264 video and produces results in frames-per-second. H.265/HEVC video encoding is the future of video able to compress significantly larger resolution videos including 4K and make streaming feasible. The downside is that hardware support is still few and far between so processing requirement is steeper than current H.264/AVC standards. x.265 is an open-source implementation of the H.265 standard and x.265 HD benchmark tests the CPU’s ability to process an HEVC video. This is purely processing power benchmark and the i7-5775C manages to stay close to the i7-4770K despite the lower clock speed. It will be interesting to see the clock-for-clock comparison later.

x264 Intel Core i7-5775C Review: More Than Meets the Eye 5775C, 6200, broadwell, crystalwell, Intel, iris pro 5


Handbrake is free open-source video transcoder that can convert various video file formats to compatible video files for other typical media viewing applications such as in an iPhone or Android tablet. Blender Foundation’s open movie Sintel video, a 1GB 1080p H.264 5.1 surround audio MKV file was used converted to the built-in iPod Preset (5G Support), then manually timed. The results are in seconds and the lower number is the better result.


WinRAR is a very popular compression program and has a built-in multi-threaded benchmark. The new Broadwell i7-5775C clearly pulls ahead here in compression and more than makes up for the lower multi-core performance in the Cinebench CPU rendering benchmark.


Other than the OpenGL test in the Cinebench R15 benchmark, PCMark 8 is the only program in our CPU test suite that includes the GPU for benchmarking since it is a semi-synthetic measuring program that simulates typical home, work or creative authoring related workloads including web browsing, gaming, photo editing, video chat and productivity. Like Futuremark’s 3DMark, a numerical score is generated from the combination of semi-synthetic tests. The score reflects the performance of the entire system (including GPU and SSD performance) and how well it performs the tasks relative to other PCs. Not surprisingly, the creativity score shot through with the i7-5775C compared to the i7-4770K due to strong graphics performance. Despite the A10-7850K’s strong Radeon R7 GPU, scores are a lot lower due the hampered CPU processing power seen in the benchmarks previously.

Intel Core i7-5775C Review: More Than Meets the Eye 5775C, 6200, broadwell, crystalwell, Intel, iris pro 6

Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6Next page


  1. Wow man what can I say. Excellent review, I am a bit disappointed that the 5775C does not have at least the same frequency of the 4790K, I believe for people that have machine that do not use a graphics card, this might be a better choice because of the Intel graphics. Plus the fact that the 5770C is LGA and not BGA is also a plus. My understanding is that with BGA you have to change out the whole motherboard also. So for people that are using a previous 1150 build to upgrade, this would make the chip not worth the trouble. I would love to see what GPU the new 6200 graphics stack up against. Again Ron, very informative and excellent review.

  2. Thank you very much Alan. Yeah, although looking at it from Intel’s perspective this is a win for them. This move will push more of the enthusiast crowd to the HEDT/Intel Extreme platform while increasing the userbase of the mainstream desktop platform for those that want a capable integrated IGP with a more powerful CPU and those who want a more powerful option than what AMD offers.

  3. people who are going to buy an i7 problably wont be using the integrated graphics and the point of AMDs apus where never to be high end they gave decent gaming performance at 720p this are entirely different consumers they guy that thinking of buying an APU is not going to buy an intel processor

  4. I am sorry for AMD they are 1 or 2 steps behind from Intel it seems
    Someone that wants performance will surely choose this processor over anything that AMD offers right now

We Want To Hear From You!

Back to top button